|
|
|
Beautiful Dreamer, essay by David Gibson, 2005,
Spaces, Cleveland, Ohio
Beautiful Dreamer
The purpose of Beautiful Dreamer is to discover the inherent truths contained in art work that explores
the fantastic, the ambiguous, the obscure, and the fanciful in order
to gain perspective on agendas of contemporary art production and
the contingencies of meaning which they share. This exhibition explores
the context of romanticism in the situation of contemporary art,
its roots in certain historical tendencies, its cultivation of a
genre of inspiration, and the resulting variety of forms which emerge
from it. A nearly paradigmatic sensibility serves not only as the
means for creative expression in the arts, but also as the basis
for revolutions in scientific, social, or political change. The
“beautiful dreamer” of the title is both an archetype
and a person, directed bya divine wish to connect with the inspirational
elements in both conscious and unconscious endeavor that feed our
dreams, and alternately, our ability to dream.
An interest in the fanciful and the fantastic leads into areas of
introspection and wild conjecture that cultivate our desire to escape
from the demands or quotidian existence. The artist creates a version
of the world that can be laid over the real world, deceptively replacing
it with a version which incorporates genres of ambiguity and agendas
of aesthetic inquiry which both critique and subvert reality itself.
These two terms – the fanciful and the fantastic – illustrate
a variety of forms and expressions available to us in the realm
of the unconscious where dreams and reveries first occur. Our memory
of dreams, and the texture of that sort of experience, inspires
us to reflect upon our conscious endeavor. The fanciful can best
be described as that order which compares to an experience of beauty,
of its tendency to charm and compel us, and is realized in scenes
where a romantic sensibility finds its most facile, nearly kitsch
interest (i.e. scenes from a bygone past, ranging from Medieval
to Victorian models) which encourages a form of escapism from the
mundane that finds its best response in a fulfillment of such ends.
The fantastic, on the other hand, refers to a forward-looking worldview,
in which vistas of unknown character and dimension are sought out,
and all that holds them together is the moral aspect with which
we conduct ourselves. This genre of inspiration is best illustrated
in terms of science fiction and the metaphysical continuum which
radically intertwines in this specific context with the quality
of adventurous experience that it makes possible.
The ambiguous and the obscure also contribute heavily to our understanding
of the nature of inspiration, yet in fairly oblique ways. Their
immediate effect is one of being overwhelmed by mystery, or by the
details, whether the forms communicating them emerge from the unconscious,
as in the paintings of Salvador Dali, or travel to us from faraway
lands, as in the exotic influences of Asian or Middle-Eastern palaces
and landscapes. The artists I have chosen for this exhibition all
express a rigor of reverie – a formal focus combined with
and constrained by an intensity of vision which is unencumbered
by ulterior agendas whether they be personal, political, or unconscious.
Themes and agendas consistent to the many bodies of work comprising
this exhibition include: an engagement with the unknown; the imposition
of aesthetic absolutes; the dramatization of psychological landscapes;
and building a visual context to the collective unconscious. Such
themes are both process and product, and alternately they contribute
to the same source from which they draw their initial energies.
The overall agenda of romanticism holds sway in each case, emboldened
by the separate goals which independent artists provide for its
envisioning. In order to better comprehend the utility of each of
these themes, one can view the artists participating in Beautiful
Dreamer as active practitioners in expanding the influence
of romanticism, though it may radically depart from its original
meaning in art history.
Use of the body as a means of experiencing the realm of the senses
leads us directly into confrontations with nature and its capacity
to charm and even befuddle the senses, contrasted with its equal
capacity to overwhelm and awe us with its random complexity and
power. We have at our disposal a highly idiosyncratic sense of body-image,
through which various artistic expressions may seem manifest or
merely suggestive of common posers. What we encounter depends upon
our perspective. The poured acrylic paintings of Peggy
Bates, for instance, recall experiences with various naturally
occurring bodies of water. The process of making these paintings
is heavily invested in the liquid qualities of her medium, as well
as in an evocation of the sensory engagement with the natural environment
and the intuitive response which it triggers in us. The digital
collages of Sandra Bermudez combine
the visceral quality of the female body with its reflection in the
workings of organic nature. Subtly illustrated human forms (the
artist as a Latino burlesque dancer in full regalia of boa feathers)
stand in for the flower or fruit on a tree limb. The drawings of
Ruth Waldman create a tapestry of
bodies that interact to produce a state of tension, with biomorphic
creatures whose relationships are simultaneously symbiotic and antagonistic.
These precariously balanced creatures are subject to forces on a
larger, unseen scale. Similarly symbolic, though also didactic,
the word paintings of Liz-N-Val represent a form of idealism approaching a metaphysical sublime.
With words traveling along all lines of sight to the distant horizon,
they symbolize the role of language in passing through time and
space to a great yet unknown destiny.
Another theme is characterized by the use of textile or media-influenced
constructions, in which artists such as Katherine
Daniels, Tara Giannini, Gae Savannah, Alexander Reyna, and Tim Rollins impart a web of sensations that connect us to knowledge through
beauty or adornment. Materials such as: Indian and Asian cloth;
immense beaded structures; curiosity cabinets filled with taxidermied
animals; feathers and glitter, a pastiche of media-inflected events
and comic book styles; all are indicative of an attempt to overwhelm
our naturally intuitive disposition with details and aesthetic associations
that are more often than not unconscious in nature. Despite our
tendency to react to such stimuli with pleasure or circumspection,
we are at the mercy of a range of impressions that precede conscious
enjoinder between the facts and the appreciation of sublime reality.
Narratives are often the best way to relate to the expressions of
romantic nature, as truth easily emerges from the process of storytelling
as well as in the structure or rhythm of the facts, which alternate
between the specific and the ineffable. A narrative may be mainly
emotional and yet by the range of imagery or the tone of its presentation
may also fulfill initial expectations on the part of the witness.
Artists such as Amy Chaiklin, Carla Gannis,
Elizabeth Huey, Kim Keever, Dean Monogenis, Leemour Pelli, and Conrad
Vogel all invest their work highly within the context of
narrative, whether to impart a mediated symbolic order in the place
of idiosyncratic meaning, or to layer personal experience alongside
or within images that have been psychologically acquired from mass
media, other artists, and the manifestation of experiential landscapes.
Despite the absence of human figures (whether describing real places,
agglomerations of linked and culturally loaded imagery or scenes
out of the ether of memory) the process of their development from
image to fact enlarges the context of our introspective understanding
of how narratives succeed.
Finally and cumulatively, the realizations of visual manifestations
that allow us to peer into the collective unconscious are at hand
in the work of artists such as Maureen Conner, Marcella Hackbardt,
Karen Marston, Russell Nachman, Mark Power, Drew Shiflett. Each
of these artists generates a body of work that is different from
the others, but shares a commonality in their formal concerns operating
in the direction of the unconscious rather than at the expense of
it. The works themselves may utilize a variety of methods, such
as: theater sets and video; digital or manual collage; paintings
depicting characters from childhood stories made palpably adult;
highly concentrated and metaphysically intense scenes that contain
a multitude of cross-referenced cultural motifs; and sculptures
which alternately sample and illustrate the formal recognition that
accompany loaded architectural or utilitarian objects, yet what
they maintain is a distinct imperative grounded in a trust of unconscious
accrual of meaning dependent solely upon the range of applicable
allegory in any given interpretation.
The romantic spirit infuses a broad range of expressions in contemporary
art practive responding to the current era both in terms of art
history and actual history, and all of the currents which run between
them. It inhabits the tenor of its own age, in which artists may
act as arbiters of social justice or aesthetic critique yet maintain
the integrity of the creative act as a means for personal expression.
The idiosyncrasy of these artists is reflective of the idiosyncrasy
of the current era, in which many visions combine to form the world.
The dreamers are beautiful and because of them, our future remains
bright.
David Gibson
|
|
 |



Constructed Drawings, essay by Nancy Princenthal, 2011, Guild Hall Museum, East Hampton, New York
“Collection
Insights: Recent Acquisitions,” essay by Janet Goleas, 2007, Islip Art Museum, East Islip, New York
"Six
Outdoor Projects At LIU", essay by Matt Freedman, 2005,
Long Island University, Brooklyn, New York
"Beautiful
Dreamer",
essay by David Gibson, 2005, SPACES, Cleveland, Ohio
“Collection
Insights: Drew Shiflett On Linear Thinking,” essay by Janet Goleas,
2004, Islip Art Museum, East Islip, New York
“Work in Process,” essay
by Kristen Frederickson PhD, 2003
"Making It Up," essay by curators
David Finn and Victor Faccinto, 1999
"Correct Me If I'm Wrong,"
essay by Barry Schwabsky, 1997
In
Three Dimensions: Women Sculptors of the '90s,
essay by Charlotte Streifer Rubinstein (catalog), '96
Margaret
McInroe, “Survival,” Hunter College (catalog),
'95
Charles
Long, "Critical Mass",Dallas Artists Research (catalog),
'94
Kathleen Cullen, "Drew Shiflett",
The Interart Center (catalog),
'93
Nancy
Princenthal, "Idio Cognito" (catalog), '93

Janet Goleas, "An Identity With the Process," The East Hampton Star, November 10, 2011
Kofi Forson, “Whitehot / November 2010, Interviews Jill Conner on Core and Mantle,” Whitehot Magazine, November, 2010
Eric Ernst, "A Philosophical Thread Tying Two Styles Together," The East Hampton Press & The Southampton Press, February 16 & 18, 2010
Christopher Hart Chambers, “Ruminations in Paper – Drew Shiflett at Lesley Heller Gallery
In New York,” Dart International, Volume 12, Number 1, Spring/Summer 2009
Jennifer Landes, “Artists Do Still Live Here,” The East Hampton Star, May 14, 2009
Elise D’Haene, “The Art Scene – Top Honors For Drew Shiflett,” The East Hampton Star, May 7, 2009
Pat Rogers, “A Show That’s Fun and Exciting,” The Southampton Press, April 30, 2009
Pat Rogers, “350 Artist Members All Under One Roof,” The Easthampton Press, April 29, 2009
Sharon Butler, “Drew Shiflett: The Raw Transformative Power of Obsession,” www.twocoatsofpaint.blogspot.com, January 14, 2009
Ariella Budick, “A Whiter Shade of Pale Suggesting Angels, DNA,” Newsday, July 20, 2007
Karen Searle, "Plane & Form at Minnesota Center for Book Arts," Hand Papermaking, June Issue 2006
Jill
Conner, “CustomFit,” Contemporary, Issue no. 52, 2003
Phoebe Mitchell, "Hampden Gallery
Abstracts Invite Viewers Within," Hampshire Gazette, May 1, 2003
Rachel Youens, "In Review - Sculpture
at Flipside," Arts, Vol. 1, Number 4, wburg.com, 2001
Holland Cotter, "Sculpture,"
The New York Times, May 11&18, 2001
Ken Johnson, "Invented Spaces"
The New York Times, Jan. 19&26, 2001
Tom Patterson, "New York Explorers"
Winston-Salem Journal, Mar. 21, '99
Tom Patterson, "All That Jazz,"
Winston-Salem Journal, Mar. 7, '99
Annie Herron, "Fresh Perspectives,"
Review, March 15, '97
Helen A. Harrison, "Artists Who
Make Work Out of Play," The New York Times, January 7, '96
Tom Moody, "Critical Mass,"
Art Papers, July/Aug., '95
Charles Dee Mitchell,, "'Critical
Mass': More Than Meets The Eye," The Dallas Morning News, Feb. 3,
'95
Shawn Hill, "Nature's Ordeal,"
Bay Windows, Nov. 17, '94
Grace Glueck, "Update 1984-85,"
The New York Times, June 21, '85
Marilu Knode, “22 Wooster ‘Rhythm
and Form’,” Manhattan Arts, Vol 11, No. 2, Feb. 1, '84

|